By Terminating a Harsh Tory Welfare Policy, This Budget Clearly Sets Out How Labour Will Fight the Battle to Revitalize Britain
Just recently, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour budget. People have been calling for Labour’s mission and principles to be more clearly expressed. By way of the choices made – a transition to a more equitable tax system, focusing on wealth to fund addressing child poverty, good public services and the living expenses – we have clearly set out what we stand for.
This is why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the battles to come. And it’s why the protests from the right began right away.
The Main Dividing Line in UK Politics
The central dividing line in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who aim to change it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who support the current system and the failed doctrine of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the debate.
The Tories were given 14 years to resolve things and instead, by every standard, they got much worse. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and neglecting to support young people after the pandemic – didn’t work.
Legacy of Decline Under the Previous Government
Quality of life fell by the largest margin since records began, child poverty hit record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis took hold, young people scarred by Covid were abandoned. The history of failure goes on.
A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the case for why our approach will yield benefits.
Social Security and Youth Deprivation
Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state is forced to paying more to deal with the effects instead of the cure.
It’s why we are building more social housing than for a generation, raising wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.
Removing the Two-Child Limit
It’s also why we are absolutely right to use this budget to lift the two-child benefit cap.
For eight long years, since it was enacted, poorer families with children have endured from a unjust social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.
It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being heartless and immoral.
Real Impact in Local Areas
From experience from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in cramped, damp homes, parents during the holidays depending on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already stretched but have to redirect time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of severe deprivation.
Long-Term Effects of Child Poverty
Just one in four pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among affluent families. This predisposes them for the challenges they face throughout their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.
Confronting child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.
That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the challenging economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred extra children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was vital.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of failed conservative ideology. Now it is abolished.
Fair Financing for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these initiatives are being paid for in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Conclusion
Equity and purpose – that’s how we will win the battle of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we won the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I repeatedly said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s keep hold of it and prevail in this fight about how we will rebuild Britain and address the deep inequalities holding us back.